<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple stirs the pot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://navelgaze.org/archives/45/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://navelgaze.org/archives/45</link>
	<description>or how i learned to elevate the mundane</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 10:15:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://navelgaze.org/archives/45/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://navelgaze.org/?p=45#comment-21</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s tempting, but there are still a couple of problems with getting a Mac.  First, there&#039;s still the price premium.  For the gorgeous, but somewhat underpowered (at the price) hardware, you pay a premium.  Apple going Intel hasn&#039;t seemed to lessen that.  The other potential issue is how ultraportable the smaller MacBook will be.  It&#039;s gotta weigh in at less than 5 lbs since most of the Ultraportables are between 2.8 and 4.5 lbs.

If it were for me, I&#039;d just get the lovely MacBook Pro, but size/weight are at the top of the list for The Wife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s tempting, but there are still a couple of problems with getting a Mac.  First, there&#8217;s still the price premium.  For the gorgeous, but somewhat underpowered (at the price) hardware, you pay a premium.  Apple going Intel hasn&#8217;t seemed to lessen that.  The other potential issue is how ultraportable the smaller MacBook will be.  It&#8217;s gotta weigh in at less than 5 lbs since most of the Ultraportables are between 2.8 and 4.5 lbs.</p>
<p>If it were for me, I&#8217;d just get the lovely MacBook Pro, but size/weight are at the top of the list for The Wife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrick</title>
		<link>http://navelgaze.org/archives/45/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://navelgaze.org/?p=45#comment-20</guid>
		<description>It could be only a couple of months &#039;till we see the new iBook, probably called &quot;MacBook&quot;. That might be the one for you. Supposedly it will have a 13&quot; screen which would put it closer to the ultraportable class than the MacBook Pro.

I dare you to switch. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be only a couple of months &#8217;till we see the new iBook, probably called &#8220;MacBook&#8221;. That might be the one for you. Supposedly it will have a 13&#8243; screen which would put it closer to the ultraportable class than the MacBook Pro.</p>
<p>I dare you to switch. <img src='http://navelgaze.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

